Does a link in a <noscript> tag get crawled by Googlebot ?
TL;DR: Yes, it took ~24h for Googlebot to visit the URL found in the <a href… placed in a <noscript> tag. Below the “protocol”.
This is the purpose of this SEO test.
I’ve added a <noscript> tag in this page, and each time a bot crawls the links in the <noscript> tag, I’ll get an email.
A better version would be to also store in database the number of time it has been crawled, by which bots (using UserAgent + regex for instance). It might be easily implemented in WordPress as a plugin. But since I’m not very aware of how it works and because the result of this test is pretty important to take a decision, I’ll just keep my logic for tests as it is đ
This is how it looks in the source code; I’ve simply updated the content of the parameter “test” in the screenshot, to make sure that even if Googlebot uses OCR, it can’t discover the link
edit 08/12/2025: My bad, the HTML was between the <code> tag, so Googlebot couldn’t find it. I’ve added a new tag, so lets see if Googlebot visits it !
edit 09/12/2025: It works, but not exactly as expected. Googlebot came with the User Agent ‘GoogleOther’. This is not what is expected. I expected Googlebot Mobile (or Desktop). CrawlGenius (formerly Kelo.gs) also discovered the URL đ
=> Lets see in few days if it comes back with another User Agent !
edit 10/09/2025: It works as expected. Googlebot came to visit the “honeypot” URL, and this time with the good Googlebot. It took it A bit more than 24 hours to visit the link. It’s seems a lot, especially because the link was on the homepage, so I’ll now put a link not hidden in <noscript> to check if it takes less time to Googlebot to crawl the link.
Au travail, dans un commerce ou dans une relation de service, le sourire et lâattention peuvent faire partie du rĂŽle professionnel. Dans un groupe dâamis, une personne chaleureuse peut se comporter ainsi avec tout le monde. Tenez-en compte sans la surveiller ni chercher Ă comptabiliser ses gestes.
In this post I will change the canonical URL in the <head>, just to see how Google and Googlebot behave between discovery of the URL discovered in the tag.
I recently stated a huge difference between the traffic monitored in the Search Console and what I could find in the log files using Kelogs log analyzer. My first hypothesis is that Google Image could be at the origin of this difference, with a preload in background. Second hypothesis is that the first results in Google Web is preloaded if the page is usually too slow.
Protocol to check the first hypothesis:
I’ll try to get the image below indexed for this website, despite it is hosted on amazon, and I will live check the impact on log files when I search for it in Google.
Let’s come back in few days when Googlebot will have indexed this page and display the image in Google Image (I’ll use “site:quentinadt.com” to check it).
So here is the picture of someone swimming:
To check the second hypothesis, Ill make a page which is very slow but ranks on a specific unique keyword.
In this post, there is a background image. It is the picture of my 3 years old Macbook Pro 2016 which is already dying… The screen is sometimes not usable, and most of the time there is just one line, vertical.
The idea is to check if either of not Google will index an image which is accessible only from a background CSS call.
John Muller, from Google, in 2018:
And as far as I know we don’t use CSS images at all for image search.
If you’ve read my last blog post, you will see that it didn’t help to use the title of an image to rank in the SERPs.
So I decided to push the test a little bit further, until I manage to get the image indexed.
So here is the picture of a very rare – endemic – fish that you can found only in Croatian rivers. I’m note passionate about fish, but I thought it’s an ok picture for testing the ranking capacities of the title element.
So again, I’ve added a title, but this time, it contains what most probably is the name of this endemic fish.
I recently read that Google uses the title of the images to rank them in Google Images.
It would be kind of a little revolution, since it has never been considered as useful.
I decided to make my own test, just to make sure it works also for me.
So here is the picture, it’s a screenshot of a presentation shared on Linkedin. There are 34 keywords in the title. You can only find the keywords in the title.
This page will be updated with the results !
Edit 1: 3 days later, the page is indexed, but the keywords in the title aren’t findable in Google. So currently, the title has zero impact.
Edit 2: 2 weeks after, still no result when I search a keyword found in the title.